Choosing between the good and the pleasant
BY: ARTHUR SHIMKUS

Let's put a bit of spirituality into politics. In a mailer entitled "Session Update: Report to Citizens About the 2004 Legislative Session," Rep. Robert Pritchard is praised for his "successful effort blocking legislation that would have prevented the reopening of the Cavel International animal processing plant in DeKalb."

Pritchard says "This is about jobs and choice for animal owners." It's about choice all right. Two classes of things constantly present themselves to man for acceptance - the good and the pleasant. Each person has to think and choose between them. The wise person chooses the good; the unwise, through selfishness, chooses the pleasant. The good and the pleasant are often not mutually exclusive, but when it comes to taking innocent lives for the sake of money they certainly are.

If Rep. Pritchard doesn't see anything wrong with horses suffering and being killed then he should have no objection to the Cavel plant being open to the public. Perhaps he would want field trips available so schoolchildren also can see!

Rep. Pritchard talks of "good paying jobs," tax revenues and giving the economy a "shot in the arm." (he neglected to talk about the profits Cavel will make). Pay no attention to the fact that it's all blood money.

Because of our love of the "almighty" dollar, no wonder we as a nation have become so addicted to wealth over principles that we ended up going to war in an attempt to secure the oil we need to maintain our unnaturally affluent lifestyles. It is time we learn that we cannot serve two masters: God and mammon. "The Tao of Heaven is to take from those who have too much, and give to those who do not have enough." - Lao Tzu

Remember, come election time, vote the bum out.

ARTHUR SHIMKUS
 
  July 4, 2008 Copyright 2008©